The Asbury Park Press - October 20, 2005
Lucent retirees get sticker shock
Some Lucent Technologies
retirees are suffering from sticker shock after the company told them they
will have to pay more for health insurance coverage for their dependents
next year.
Freehold resident William J. Benden, who retired in 1992, said the cost of
medical benefits for himself and his wife next year will rise to $347 a
month in 2006, up from $275 a month. In 2002, his bill was $90 a month.
"I have watched the progression of it," said Benden, 72. "They are
increasing it to a point where they don't have to pay for anything."
This year, Lucent, which provides health insurance coverage to about 125,000
retirees and their 75,000 dependents, stopped subsidizing health-care costs
for dependents of management retirees who left the company on or after March
1, 1990, and who earned more than $65,000.
The coverage for dependents was made available to those retirees at group
rates. Retirees opted to buy coverage for about 9,000 dependents, about 4.5
percent of the people the company covers, said Lucent spokeswoman Mary Ward.
"That 4.5 percent did see an increase in their premiums because there was a
gap between what they paid in premiums and what it cost to provide them
coverage in 2005," Ward said. "Consequently for 2006, we are increasing
premiums to more accurately reflect how much is being spent on their health
care."
The amount of the increase depends on the coverage selected, Ward said. "In
some cases, it could be substantial, but it varies," she said.
But Ward said the majority of Lucent retirees and dependents will see
"minimal or no increase in the cost of coverage." Retirees also recently
received a total of about $14 million in refunds because the cost of their
health-care was lower than anticipated this year, the spokeswoman said.
The Lucent Retirees Organization said the bad news came to about 30,000
management retirees. The monthly premiums for health care coverage will rise
as much as 39 percent, the association said.
"Lucent executives rightly communicate how well the company is doing
financially to Wall Street while, at the same time, requiring their retirees
to take on an ever-increasing share of the cost of their well-earned health
care benefits," said Ken Raschke, president of Lucent Retirees Organization.
A more-than-30-percent increase in health-care premiums is "unwarranted,"
Raschke said in a statement.
"This is morally wrong," he said. "We believe retirees earned through
decades of their labor the right to health-care benefits at a reasonable
cost."
The increases are just the latest decision to affect retirees, he said.
Other measures included the elimination of the death benefit in February
2003. Later, the company stopped reimbursing retirees and spouses for Part B
Medicare coverage.
Lucent's Ward said health-care costs are rising. The company has to balance
the needs of retirees with Lucent's ability to work in a dynamic market, she
said.
"We have to remain competitive," Ward said. "If we don't, there's nothing to
be done."
Dover Township resident and retiree Andrew G. Jensen, 59, opted to go on his
wife's plan; she works in the Toms River Regional school district.
"The prices are unbelievable," Jensen said. "It is no longer a benefit. It
is getting costly."